PelhamToday received the following letter taking Hot Take columnist James Culic to task for his views on rowing.
While I agree with James Culic’s conclusion, I do not agree with his assessment of rowing. I am a Pelham resident who teaches and coaches rowing at Thorold Secondary. To call rowing a sport for the wealthy is ridiculous and outdated. My rowers come from a variety of backgrounds and mostly limited means. While we have had to search for funds so that everyone can participate, the fees are actually very reasonable.
Let’s explore two other common activities for comparison: hockey and dancing. While season of rowing costs about $500 (at TSS $504 includes uniform) a hockey or dance season will often exceed three-to-eight times that number. Especially with equipment or costume costs.
So, no, Mr. Culic, you are horribly mistaken. I think you are picturing the rowers of the early 20th century. Rowing is very accessible and rowing organizations prioritize access.
While hockey, admirably, attempts to be inclusive, the bar is significantly higher. And the dance bar? Well, most of us can’t even get our foot on it.
However, you are correct about the Town not supporting local rowers without supporting a host of other local sporting concerns that are more pressing.
In the meantime, Mr Culic, please stop painting this outdated and inaccurate caricature of rowing.
Cam Stone
Fonthill
